Assessment of next-best-view algorithms performance with various 3D scanners and manipulator

Maciej Karaszewski , Marcin Adamczyk , Robert Sitnik

Abstract

The problem of calculating three dimensional (3D) sensor position (and orientation) during the digitization of real-world objects (called next best view planning or NBV) has been an active topic of research for over 20 years. While many solutions have been developed, it is hard to compare their quality based only on the exemplary results presented in papers. We implemented 13 of the most popular NBV algorithms and evaluated their performance by digitizing five objects of various properties, using three measurement heads with different working volumes mounted on a 6-axis robot with a rotating table for placing objects. The results obtained for the 13 algorithms were then compared based on four criteria: the number of directional measurements, digitization time, total positioning distance, and surface coverage required to digitize test objects with available measurement heads.
Author Maciej Karaszewski IMiF
Maciej Karaszewski,,
- The Institute of Micromechanics and Photonics
, Marcin Adamczyk IMiF
Marcin Adamczyk,,
- The Institute of Micromechanics and Photonics
, Robert Sitnik IMiF
Robert Sitnik,,
- The Institute of Micromechanics and Photonics
Journal seriesISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, ISSN 0924-2716
Issue year2016
Vol119
Pages320-330
Publication size in sheets0.65
Keywords in Polishwyznaczanie kierunków pomiarowych, digitalizacja 3D, wysokorozdzielcze pomiary 3D, automatyczna digitalizacja
Keywords in EnglishNext-best view; 3D digitization; High-resolution 3D measurement; Automated digitization
DOIDOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.06.015
URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271616301307
Languageen angielski
Score (nominal)45
ScoreMinisterial score = 45.0, 28-11-2017, ArticleFromJournal
Ministerial score (2013-2016) = 45.0, 28-11-2017, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators WoS Impact Factor: 2016 = 6.387 (2) - 2016=6.457 (5)
Citation count*8 (2018-07-17)
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record
msginfo.png


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back