The effect of observation correlations upon the basic characteristics of reliability matrix as oblique projection operator
Witold Prószyński , Mieczysław Kwaśniak
AbstractThe reliability matrix, being an oblique projection operator, transforms correlated observations into the least squares residuals in Gauss–Markov models. It also allows to study model responses in individual observations to the assumed configurations of gross errors. The variability of the basic characteristics of the operator due to the increase in observation correlations is investigated by means of numerical tests and theoretical derivations. The characteristics such as diagonal elements and asymmetry indices have not that long ago been introduced as the response-based measures of internal reliability and subjected to the analysis. Here, additionally, the relationship between the asymmetry indices and the angles of non-orthogonality of projection is derived. The measures are compared in terms of the effect of observation correlations with the commonly used reliability measures obtained on the basis of statistical tests for detection and identification of outliers, such as generalized reliability numbers and minimal detectable biases. For the purposes of the present paper, the latter are termed the testing-based measures. The comparative analysis shows that both the types, when taken together, provide complete information about the behaviour of a GMM with correlated observations in the presence of a gross error in a particular observation and about its detectability. Hence, the conclusion is that the response-based measures can be a useful supplementation of the testing-based measures for the phase of network design.
|Journal series||Journal of Geodesy, ISSN 0949-7714, (A 40 pkt)|
|Vol||First online 12.02.2019|
|Publication size in sheets||0.5|
|Keywords in English||Internal reliability, Response-based measures, Testing-based measures, Oblique projection operator, Angles of non-orthogonality|
|ASJC Classification||; ;|
|Score||= 40.0, 27-05-2019, ArticleFromJournal|
|Publication indicators||: 2017 = 2.844; : 2017 = 4.633 (2) - 2017=4.409 (5)|
* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.