Two-stage automated measurement process for high-resolution 3D digitization of unknown objects

Maciej Karaszewski , M. Stępień , Robert Sitnik


In this paper, a process for high-resolution, automated 3D digitization of unknown objects (i.e., without any digital model) is presented. The process has two stages—the first leads to a coarse 3D digital model of the object, and the second obtains the final model. A rough model, acquired by a 3D measurement head with a large working volume and relatively low resolution, is used to calculate the precise head positions required for the full digitization of the object, as well as collision detection and avoidance. We show that this approach is much more efficient than digitization with only a precise head, when its positions for subsequent measurements (so-called next-best-views) must be calculated based only on a partially recovered 3D model of the object. We also show how using a rough object representation for collision detection shortens the high-resolution digitization process.
Author Maciej Karaszewski (FM / IMPh)
Maciej Karaszewski,,
- The Institute of Micromechanics and Photonics
, M. Stępień (FM / IMPh)
M. Stępień,,
- The Institute of Micromechanics and Photonics
, Robert Sitnik (FM / IMPh)
Robert Sitnik,,
- The Institute of Micromechanics and Photonics
Journal seriesApplied Optics, ISSN 1559-128X, [0003-6935]
Issue year2016
Publication size in sheets0.5
Keywords in Polishwyznaczanie kierunków pomiarowych, digitalizacja 3D, wysokorozdzielcze pomiary 3D, automatyczna digitalizacja
Keywords in EnglishNext-best view, 3D digitization, High-resolution 3D measurement, Automated digitization
ASJC Classification3107 Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Languageen angielski
Score (nominal)30
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 25.0, 19-06-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Ministerial score (2013-2016) = 30.0, 19-06-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators WoS Citations = 3; Scopus Citations = 3; GS Citations = 5.0; Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 1.157; WoS Impact Factor: 2016 = 1.65 (2) - 2016=1.645 (5)
Citation count*6 (2020-09-19)
Share Share

Get link to the record

* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Are you sure?