Holistic Analysis of Waste Copper Slag Based Concrete by Means of EIPI Method

Wojciech Kubissa , Roman Jaskulski , D. Gil , Iwona Wilińska

Abstract

The aim of the research is a comprehensive evaluation of concrete using the EIPI method. In the evaluation the compressive strength of concrete and its durability properties represented by sorptivity and air permeability are taken into account. Since waste copper slag with increased natural radioactivity is used in the assessed concrete, additional evaluation is carried out taking into account the influence of natural radioactivity within the performance index. Additionally, the reference concrete, which is made without the use of waste copper slag, is evaluated for comparative purposes. In order to make the evaluation as comprehensive as possible, the concrete made with the use of three types of cement is subjected to CEM I, CEM II and CEM III assessments. If natural radioactivity is not taken into account in the evaluation, the best result of the most favourable value of Gross Ecological and Performance Indicator (GEPI) is obtained by the concrete made with waste copper slag, and if radioactivity is considered, the most favourable value of GEPI is obtained with concrete without addition of the waste. The results show that in both approaches the best result is achieved by concrete with CEM III cement. It follows from the above that although natural radioactivity has a significant impact on the EIPI evaluation result, the decisive factor is still the type of cement.
Author Wojciech Kubissa (FCEMP / ICEn)
Wojciech Kubissa,,
- Insitute of Civil Engineering
, Roman Jaskulski (FCEMP / ICEn)
Roman Jaskulski,,
- Insitute of Civil Engineering
, D. Gil - [Politechnika Lubelska]
D. Gil,,
-
-
, Iwona Wilińska (FCEMP / IC)
Iwona Wilińska,,
- The Institute of Chemistry
Journal seriesBuildings, ISSN 0007-3725, e-ISSN 2471-3112
Issue year2020
Vol10
No1
Pages1-15
Publication size in sheets0.3
ASJC Classification2205 Civil and Structural Engineering; 2215 Building and Construction; 2216 Architecture
DOIDOI:10.3390/buildings10010001
Languageen angielski
File
buildings-10-00001.pdf 698.27 KB
Score (nominal)70
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 70.0, 03-06-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators WoS Citations = 0; Scopus Citations = 0; Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 0.568
Citation count*
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?