ACBC-Adequate Association and Decision Rules Versus Key Generators and Rough Sets Approximations

Marzena Kryszkiewicz

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an ACBC-evaluation formula, which delivers a flexible way of formulating different kinds of criteria for association and decision rules. We prove that rules with minimal antecedents that fulfill ACBC-evaluation formulae are key generators, which are patterns of a special type. We also show that a number of types of rough set approximations of decision classes can be expressed based on ACBC-evaluation formulae. We prove that decision rules preserving respective approximations of decision classes are rules that satisfy an ACBC-evaluation formula and that antecedents of such optimal decision rules are key generators, too. A number of properties related to particular measures of association rules and key generators are derived.
Author Marzena Kryszkiewicz (FEIT / IN)
Marzena Kryszkiewicz,,
- The Institute of Computer Science
Journal seriesFundamenta Informaticae, ISSN 0169-2968
Issue year2016
Vol148
No1-2
Pages65-85
Publication size in sheets1
ASJC Classification1703 Computational Theory and Mathematics; 1710 Information Systems; 2602 Algebra and Number Theory; 2614 Theoretical Computer Science
DOIDOI:10.3233/FI-2016-1423
URL http://content.iospress.com/articles/fundamenta-informaticae/fi1423
ProjectDevelopment of new algorithms in the areas of software and computer architecture, artificial intelligence and information systems and computer graphics . Project leader: Arabas Jarosław, , Phone: +48 22 234 7432, start date 15-04-2016, end date 30-11-2017, II/2016/DS/1, Completed
WEiTI Działalność statutowa
Languageen angielski
Score (nominal)20
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 20.0, 02-02-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Ministerial score (2013-2016) = 20.0, 02-02-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators WoS Citations = 1; Scopus Citations = 1; GS Citations = 1.0; Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 0.712; WoS Impact Factor: 2016 = 0.687 (2) - 2016=0.775 (5)
Citation count*1 (2020-09-06)
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?