Post-mortem Human Iris Recognition

Mateusz Trokielewicz , Adam Czajka , Piotr Maciejewicz


This paper presents a unique analysis of post-mortem human iris recognition. Post-mortem human iris images were collected at the university mortuary in three sessions separated by approximately 11 hours, with the first session organized from 5 to 7 hours after demise. Analysis performed for four independent iris recognition methods shows that the common claim of the iris being useless for biometric identification soon after death is not entirely true. Since the pupil has a constant and neutral dilation after death (the so called “cadaveric position”), this makes the iris pattern perfectly visible from the standpoint of dilation. We found that more than 90% of irises are still correctly recognized when captured a few hours after death, and that serious iris deterioration begins approximately 22 hours later, since the recognition rate drops to a range of 13.3-73.3% (depending on the method used) when the cornea starts to be cloudy. There were only two failures to enroll (out of 104 images) observed for only a single method (out of four employed in this study). These findings show that the dynamics of post-mortem changes to the iris that are important for biometric identification are much more moderate than previously believed. To the best of our knowledge, this paper presents the first experimental study of how iris recognition works after death, and we hope that these preliminary findings will stimulate further research in this area.
Author Mateusz Trokielewicz (FEIT / AK) - [Scientific and Academic Computer Network (NASK PIB)]
Mateusz Trokielewicz,,
- The Institute of Control and Computation Engineering
- Naukowa i Akademicka Sieć Komputerowa
, Adam Czajka (FEIT / AK)
Adam Czajka,,
- The Institute of Control and Computation Engineering
, Piotr Maciejewicz
Piotr Maciejewicz,,
Publication size in sheets0.5
Book 2016 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB). Proceedings, 2016, IEEE, ISBN 978-1-5090-1869-7, 464 p.
Languageen angielski
Trokielewicz i in. ICB 2016.pdf 487.64 KB
Score (nominal)15
Score sourceconferenceIndex
ScoreMinisterial score = 15.0, 18-05-2020, BookChapterMatConfByConferenceseries
Ministerial score (2013-2016) = 15.0, 18-05-2020, BookChapterMatConfByConferenceseries
Publication indicators WoS Citations = 1; GS Citations = 18.0
Citation count*26 (2020-08-28)
Share Share

Get link to the record

* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Are you sure?