Nanoconjugates of ferrocene and carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles as sensing platforms for voltammetric determination of ceruloplasmin in blood
Jakub Sęk , Artur Kasprzak , Michał Bystrzejewski , Magdalena Popławska , Waldemar Kaszuwara , Zbigniew Stojek , Anna M. Nowicka
AbstractThe nanoparticles comprising of iron core and carbon shell were decorated with ferrocene derivatives: ferrocene ecarboxaldehyde(Fc-1) and ferrocene ecarboxaldehyde oxime (Fc-2). A microdrop of suspension of the nanoconjugatewas placed on a glassy-carbon electrode to prepare the recognition/sensing layer. Drying and purification of the sensing layer resulted in a well-defined and stable square-wave voltammogram of the ferrocene moiety. The height of the voltammetric peak increased in the presence of ceruloplasmin. That increase was linearly dependent on the logarithmic concentration of ceruloplasmin in blood. The applied external magnetic field was a factor which yielded better sensitivity and repeatability of the sensor response. The linearity of sensor response was found to be between 0.001 and 10 μg dL−1 and 0.05–10 μg dL−1 for both nanoconjugates: Fe@C-Fc-1 and Fe@C-Fc-2, in the presence and absence of the magnet, respectively. The obtained detection limit (LOD) for Fe@C-Fc-1 was found to be 0.60 and 0.10 μg dL−1 in the absence and presence of magnetic field, respectively, whilst for Fe@C-Fc-2 was 0.4 and 0.07 μg dL−1 in the absence and presence of a magnet, respectively. The proposed method is selective because the presence of common antioxidants in blood did not interfere significantly with the determination of the concentration of ceruloplasmin.
|Journal series||Biosensors & Bioelectronics, ISSN 0956-5663, (A 40 pkt)|
|Publication size in sheets||0.5|
|Keywords in English||Nanoconjugates, Ferrocene, Carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles, Ceruloplasmin, Voltammetry, Blood analysis|
|ASJC Classification||; ; ; ;|
|Score|| = 40.0, 20-12-2018, ArticleFromJournal|
= 40.0, 20-12-2018, ArticleFromJournal
|Publication indicators||= 2; : 2016 = 1.633; : 2017 = 8.173 (2) - 2017=7.291 (5)|
* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.