Considering Carneades as a Framework for Informal Logic: A Reply to Walton and Gordon

Marcin Selinger , Marcin Koszowy

Abstract

The paper offers a critical analysis of the research program for formalizing informal logic proposed by Douglas Walton and Thomas Gordon (forthcoming). Since their proposal is based on employing the Carneades Argumentation System (CAS), this paper aims at answering two questions: what are main benefits of applying CAS as means for formalizing informal logic, and what are possible extensions of Walton and Gordon’s research program and modifications in employing CAS?
Author Marcin Selinger
Marcin Selinger,,
-
, Marcin Koszowy (FASS)
Marcin Koszowy,,
- Faculty of Administration and Social Science
Journal seriesInformal Logic, ISSN 0824-2577
Issue year2016
Vol36
No2
Pages217-237
Publication size in sheets1
Keywords in Englishargument evaluation, argument structure, argument weight, Carneades Argumentation System (CAS), conductive argument, informal logic, premise acceptability, proof standards
ASJC Classification1211 Philosophy
DOIDOI:10.22329/il.v36i2.4423
URL https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4423
Languageen angielski
Not used for evaluationyes
Score (nominal)0
Publication indicators WoS Citations = 1; GS Citations = 1.0; Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 1.471
Citation count*1 (2020-09-05)
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?