Risk of concrete carbonation with mineral industrial by-products

Lech Edward Czarnecki , Piotr Paweł Woyciechowski , Grzegorz Adamczewski


The research assesses the effect of selected type II additives on concrete carbonation. Siliceous fly ash, FASi, is used as a cement component or cement replacement in concrete; ground granulated blast furnace slag, GGBS, is used as a cement component; fluidised bed fly ash, FFACa, is used as a cement replacement; calcareous fly ash, FACa, is used as a fine aggregate replacement; and, silica fume, SF, is used as a cement or fine aggregate replacement. The results show that waste mineral additives increase the depth and rate of carbonation, while extending water curing time increases the resistance to carbonation of concrete containing additives, significantly in GGBS cement and concretes with w/c ratio above 0.35. The results show that in the case of concrete with mineral additives, such as ash and slag, the course of the initial water curing of concrete is a very important factor influencing resistance to carbonation. The application of waste mineral additives to concrete should include the lowest possible w/c ratio and the lengthiest possible water curing, immediately after the commencement of construction activity
Author Lech Edward Czarnecki (FCE / ICE)
Lech Edward Czarnecki,,
- The Institute of Civil Engineering
, Piotr Paweł Woyciechowski (FCE / ICE)
Piotr Paweł Woyciechowski,,
- The Institute of Civil Engineering
, Grzegorz Adamczewski (FCE / ICE)
Grzegorz Adamczewski,,
- The Institute of Civil Engineering
Journal seriesKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, ISSN 1226-7988
Issue year2018
Publication size in sheets0.5
Keywords in Polishbeton, popiół lotny
Keywords in Englishconcrete durability, carbonation, mineral additives, fly ash
ASJC Classification2205 Civil and Structural Engineering
URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12205-017-1623-5
Languageen angielski
Risk of concrete.pdf 442.91 KB
Score (nominal)20
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 20.0, 03-06-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators Scopus Citations = 14; WoS Citations = 4; GS Citations = 21.0; Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 0.764; WoS Impact Factor: 2018 = 1.428 (2) - 2018=1.423 (5)
Citation count*21 (2020-04-18)
Share Share

Get link to the record

* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Are you sure?